Media Now: Emotion, Affect and Mythologies

mch-final-poster_march15th_highres-page-001We are delighted to welcome:

Prof Karin Wahl-Jorgensen (School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University)

Dr Darren Kelsey (Media, Culture and Heritage, Newcastle University)

Chair: Dr Florian Zollmann (Newcastle University)

Prof Karin Wahl-Jorgensen (School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University) – ‘Anger as a Political Emotion in Media Discourses: Trump, Brexit and Beyond’

Wednesday, March 15, 3pm – 5pm in Armstrong Building 2.90

This presentation looks at the role of anger as a political emotion, in the context of recent political events. Anger has historically been viewed as a “dangerous” emotion in public life, associated with uncontrollable aggression and violence. Yet social movement scholars have discerned a mobilising potential in anger: Through sharing the experience of being angry about particular forms of injustice, citizens and activists are collectively empowered to take action.

The presentation explores how news media represent anger in a variety of different contexts, including routine protest coverage, the EU Referendum campaign, and the US Presidential election campaign of Donald Trump. The presentation suggests that anger is frequently constructed as an explanatory framework for understanding grievances, but also as a rhetorical and strategic tool for mobilising support amongst disenfranchised groups. Anger stems from collective and publicly articulated grievances, usually against larger injustices that no individual can address on their own. Ultimately, anger is always-already political, for better or worse.

Dr Darren Kelsey (Media, Culture and Heritage, Newcastle University) – ‘“You’re not laughing now, are you?” Farage, Brexit and the Hero’s Journey: a case study of affective mythology’

This paper is concerned with affective mythology and right wing populism in media coverage of Nigel Farage. It considers how archetypal traits of mythological Heroism appeared in the Mail Online through Farage’s image as a man of the people who distinguished himself from the political establishment. Through Campbell’s (1949) monomyth we see a distinct trait of this archetypal convention: The Hero’s Journey. Farage was constructed as a man on a mission, fighting against the odds, overcoming trials and tribulations to “take back control” from the EU. Hero mythology functioned to suppress ideological and historical complexities that contradicted Farage’s populist image. This analysis then extends to consider the affective-discursive loops operating through reader comments on the Mail Online website. This enables us to look more closely at responses to news stories and the contributions of readers that reflect the affective qualities of the monomyth. Through this attention to a powerful albeit familiar archetype, the ideological tensions of British national identity and EU politics are analysed in light of the referendum.


The seminar is free and is open to all interested in attending. No need to book

Advertisements

Museums, health and wellbeing: reflections on impacts and methods

 

mch-final-poster_jan27th_web-page-001

Friday, January 27, 3-5pm, Armstrong Building, 2.90

Museums, health and wellbeing: reflections on impacts and methods 

Presenters: Prof Andrew Newman, Dr Bruce Davenport (both Newcastle University), Dr Nuala Morse (The University of Manchester/UCL Culture) and Zoë Brown (Tyne and Wear Museums and Archives)

Chair: Bethany Rex (Newcastle University)

Nuala Morse*, Zoë Brown*, Linda Thomson (UCL Culture), Wendy Gallagher (Whitworth Art Gallery, University of Manchester), Helen Chatterjee (UCL Division of Biosciences and UCL Culture): “Museum-focused activities in person-centred dementia care:  Research methodologies with hospital patients”

*presenting authors

The seminar is free and is open to all interested in attending. No need to book

This study investigates the efficacy of museum-focused activities in supporting dementia care, in acute medical wards and inpatient dementia services. There is currently increased interest in using non-pharmacological interventions to target behavioural symptoms of moderate and late stage dementia such as aggression, anxiety and wandering. Museum-focused activities are proposed as a means of providing relief from these symptoms and meaningful creative activities. The study developed a methodology to assess the effect of the activities ‘in the moment’ and their short-term effect. It has been recognised that interventions with small but meaningful short-term effect are important in supporting dementia care (Pinquart et al, 2006).

Participants (n=<14) took part in weekly museum-focused activities for 6 weeks (Sept 2016-Jan 2017). Mixed methods were used comprising session observation, pre and post-session assessment of occupational therapist rated mood, social interaction and agitation (before session, 2 hours and 24 hours after session) and interviews with staff at the programme end. This work-in-progress presentation will describe the challenges of developing fit-for-purpose and gentle methodologies for researching the impact of museum-focused activities for people with dementia.

Andrew Newman: “The connectivity and social capital of people in later life with dementia: a qualitative analysis of data collected from Dementia and Imagination.”

This paper explores the connectivity and social capital (through which the value of relationships can be understood) of people in later life living with dementia. This is achieved through the analysis of qualitative data collected from a UK national research project entitled Dementia and Imagination which was funded by the ESRC and the AHRC. This involved people in later life with dementia, of various types and severity, undertaking visual arts enrichment activities at three sites in the UK.

The importance of social networks for the wellbeing of older people is well established in the literature for example, Gray (2009), Cornwall (2009), Grundy and Sloggett (2003), Pinquart and Sorensen (2000) and Litwin and Shiovitz, (2006) amongst others. However, despite associations between being embedded in social capital rich networks and reduced incidence of dementia being identified (Fratigioni et al. 2000), we know little about the lived experience of connectivity for those living with the condition.

There was a reported reduction in the size of networks and changes in the balance of the sorts of relationships they represented and the resources they provided access to in comparison to when respondents were cognitively or/and physically healthier. It was evident that some were lacking in opportunities for emotional relationships that they could contribute to as well as receive support from. This situation was more noticeable for those in care homes, with generally more advanced dementia (and sometimes frailty). The visual arts enrichment activity provided an opportunity to reconnect with others and to provide and receive emotional support.  As is noted by Ferlander (2007) emotional support has ‘positive impacts upon health, especially mental health, mainly via psychological mechanisms, such as personal control and stress reduction’ (p. 123).

Bruce Davenport: “Creative activities for people with dementia: expressions of personal identity and the practices of care in residential care settings.”

As part of the Dementia & Imagination project, programmes of 6, weekly creative workshops were delivered with people with dementia in 3 different settings in 3 parts of the UK: people living in care-homes (in the north-east of England), people in assessment centres and out-patient wards in hospitals (in the Midlands) and people living in private accommodation (in North Wales). This paper focuses on the workshops delivered in care-home and hospital settings.

The workshops in care homes involved people with dementia, the carers who worked in the care-homes and, more rarely, family members. In the hospital settings, the people with dementia were accompanied by nursing staff and, occasionally, by family members. The impact of the workshops were assessed using a variety of methods; this paper focuses on the data from qualitative interviews with participants and carers, artists’ diaries, open questions about participants’ experiences. The qualitative interviews were carried out before the workshops began, immediately after the end of the programme and 3 months later. The open questions were asked during a data gathering session immediately after the end of the programme.

The creative workshops focused on sensory stimulation and responding to each participants’ interests and expressive abilities. Nonetheless, the workshops evoked moments of reminiscence, social interaction and other expressions of personal identity. Models of quality care such as relationship-centred care, and person-centred care, recommend that carers develop an understanding of residents and patients in care and hospital settings. Whilst the value of reminiscence remains a topic for debate, the data from the interviews indicates that these moments fed into the carers’ understandings of the participants and their interactions with them. This implies a range of secondary pathways to impact from the workshops, through changes to carers and family members, rather than the direct impact of participation for the people with dementia.

The same models of care also advocate opportunities for residents to experience personal autonomy and experience being valued by others. The data indicate that the practices used by the artists were consonant with these models. The qualitative interview data indicates that the skills that the artists’ brought to the workshops were variously recognised, critiqued and resisted by the care and nursing staff.

The seminar is free and is open to all interested in attending. No need to book

 

Gender and News

Wednesday, January 18, 3-5pm, Armstrong 2.90

Gender and News

Presenters: Prof Karen Ross & Prof Deborah Chambers

Chair: Dr David Baines (all Newcastle University)

Karen Ross: “Women, men and news: the same old, same old”
Despite the presence of women on the local, national and global stage at all levels of decision-making, in numerous positions of executive authority, they continue to be marginalised in news media as sources and newsmakers. Despite entering media organisations in similar numbers to men, they do not rise as far or as fast and are often steered towards the less prestigious areas of journalism. This presentation discusses recent trends in the awkward relations between gender and journalism, identifies some of the good practices which have been implemented suggests some which are yet to be implemented.

Deborah Chambers: “Twentieth century women journalists and the ‘women’s pages’: soft news or a counterpublic sphere?”
Deborah presents a unique account of the key interventions of women writers across newspapers in post-war Britain. Approaching news as a site of inequality and difference, she traces the ways women spearheaded the introduction of new topics and styles in print to attract women readers and audiences. Despite being sidelined as trivial journalism, it was through the women’s pages and features that women introduced innovative news about women’s lives. Deborah argues that, against probability, this new feminised discourse emerged as a ‘counterpublic sphere’ that popularised feminism.
The seminar is free and is open to all interested in attending. No need to book.
mch-final-poster_jan18th-web-page-001

 

Brexit After Party II – Implications for teaching and research ’round-table’

We are delighted to announce the details of the next seminar in the MCH seminar series. This is part two of the Brexit After Party and will be held in Armstrong 2.90 from 1-2.30pm on Wednesday, December 14. Refreshments will be provided.

We have contributions from Rhiannon Mason and Darren Kelsey. These will be short presentations which will leave plenty of time for a discussion, to be chaired by Areti Galani.

All are welcome to attend

brexit-part-ii-poster-jpeg

Crisis in Slow motion: the stubborn habits of migration

seminar_30916As part of the MCH Seminar series, our next event is on Wednesday, November 30, 1pm – 3pm, G.22 Politics Building, Newcastle University. (Lunch available from 12.30pm in the Politics Staff Common Room.)

Hosted in cooperation with Politics, for this seminar we are delighted to welcome Dr Debbie Lisle (Queen’s University Belfast).

Crisis in Slow motion: the stubborn habits of migration

This paper contests the temporal ordering of crisis and emergency that framed EU migration during the summer of 2015 and continues to shape official responses to the supposed ‘weakening’ of Europe’s borders.

Focusing specifically on arrival and reception experiences on the Greek island of Kos, this paper thinks with and alongside the encounters that are occluded by dominant crisis-framings in government, policy, media and activist circles. It begins by exploring the mundane actions, daily habits and embodied rhythms of simply getting on in the midst of a crisis – the stubborn and often indifferent acts of living, persisting and moving despite the claim of emergency.

Of particular interest here are the everyday human / non-human relations that persist in repetitive acts of daily living (e.g. washing, eating, playing) as well as the complex relationships that people on the move have with objects (e.g. backpacks, smartphones). Focusing on these embodied and material relations is one way to visualize not only the rich, vibrant agencies that persist in and through moments of crisis, but also the non-spectacular moments of solidarity, care and circulation that contest dominant modes of abjection and rescue.

The seminar is free and is open to all interested in attending. No need to book.

Brexit After Party: Implications for Teaching and Research, Roundtable event

mch-final-poster-page-001

As part of the MCH Seminar series, our next event is on Wednesday, 12 October between 1pm and 2pm, and looks at the implications of Brexit for teaching and research.

Contributors: Areti Galani, Darren Kelsey, Majid Khosravanik, Rhiannon Mason

This event looks at how we might change what we teach and research as a consequence of Brexit and the numerous effects that it is having and will continue to have for higher education. The format is round-table with contributors offering some preliminary insights and then opening the discussion to the wider audience. We look forward to seeing you at this event which kicks off the MCH Seminar Series 2016-17.

Wednesday, October 12, 1pm – 2pm at Armstrong Building 2.90, Newcastle University 

Everyone is welcome, feel free to bring your lunch